No es mi mejor perfil, no me siento discriminado!!

Last year, a Texas based forensics company announced that they had found Sasquatch hair and sequenced its DNA. Of course, the scientific community demanded data.
This week, they claimed to have produced it. In a paper published by a journal they seem to have set up themselves. Last week. That has never published any other paper. There's also no evidence of peer review. Hmmmm.
More info: http://bit.ly/Xdyu03

Interestingly, the field of cryptozoology has seen a bit of a revival lately. A new peer reviewed journal has opened (unrelated to the paper above) dedicated to the field. more info: http://bit.ly/XaN35H

Thoughts on the field of cryptozoology in general? Are there any animals currently thought to be mythical that you believe will eventually be documented by zoologists?